The explicit arguments in Plato’s Phaedo, as pertain to metaphysical and theological models, are not
good arguments. Many of their assumptions are extravagant, and their reasoning
more universalizing than necessary. Much of the dialogue’s import occurs
elsewhere (in the implicature of behavior and tonal choice). There are ways
that Plato’s Dialogues do things with their form that are irreplicable in
others, but I am interested in producing analysis of other philosophical
arguments that deal with avoided arguments (or avoided actions).
Do you have an example in mind? Who else might we turn to? And could you elaborate more on what you mean by "avoided arguments/avoided actions?"
ReplyDelete